Great SaaS Companies can ONLY be Built by Solo Entrepreneurs

A team cannot build a great SaaS company. It's simply not possible, not even in theory, because of the way we designed modern programming languages. If you want to buy a great SaaS or PaaS product today, you have to choose a solo entrepreneur, where one guy is basically doing 100% of all the software development - And that single developer has to use a "declarative" programming language.

The reasons for this is because our "modern programming languages" are fundamentally incapable of creating "applications" because of their verbosity forcing us to apply SoC within the application layer to avoid repeating ourselves and keeping our code "DRY".

You see our programming languages requires teamwork and separation of concerns (SoC) within their application layers, because of code verbosity, which results in that the end application becomes spaghetti, making it impossible for any single individual to change any aspect of the app, without unintentionally create new bugs for his team members. This happens because we've been taught that "SoC is a good thing", when the truth is the exact opposite for an application developer!

Hence, the better your architecture becomes according to software development "best practices", and the more developers you add to that same project, the worse the end result becomes - Because every individual on your "team" is now unintentionally sabotaging other team member's contributions, because everything is "entangled", because of "reuse".

Separation of Concerns you see, within a single horizontal layer, results in reuse. In fact, reuse is one of its stated goals, and as we're taught SoC, we're taught that it "should be applied because it increases reusability". This reuse again results in that changing one aspect of your app amongst its horizontal layer (feature axiom), creates a cascading effect of bugs in other parts of your app. You can see an extreme example of the effect of this where I compare SalesForce's Agentforce to a free AINIRO demo AI chatbot in the following video, basically proving how I am 1.2 million times as productive as the average Salesforce engineer.

Salesforce spent 2.5 years creating Agentforce, throwing 25,000 software developers at it. AINIRO have one software developer (me!), and I created a product that's 50 times better on neutral parameters than SalesForce - And you can create an AI chatbot that's literally 50 times better than their Agentforce for free in 5 seconds here if you don't believe me.

SoC is the problem

This "entanglement of features because of SoC" again, is the very definition of "spaghetti code", and you can even measure the amount of "spaghettiness" your app suffers from, by the amount of "reuse" your app's components are applying, since both of these increases proportionally to each other linearly. To measure your app's "entangledness" again, is just to look at your own app's dependency graph, which after a couple of years worth of "teamwork" inevitably looks like something you'd pay $20 for at some cheap back alley restaurant in Italy.

By taking this to its extreme, and understanding my math from the video above, this implies I am 1.2 million times as effective and productive as the average SalesForce software developer, simply because we use zero SoC in AINIRO at the application layer. And since teamwork requires SoC when implemented using a traditional programming language, this basically proves how teamwork is ipso facto "obsolete", because the industry as a whole have completely destroyed our ability to implement it correctly, without reducing our end result's quality to such an extent that the product basically becomes useless.

To put the above into perspective, realise that Salesforce has 25,000 software developers whom have according to Marc Benioff been spending 100% of their time to try to compete with a solo entrepreneur startup (me!) now for 2.5 years - Yet still somehow, our product is 50 times better on neutral metrics, and a million times better on features.

Your Programming Language is Obsolete

The SoC problem again is a fundamental aspect of your programming language, so the problem can't be fixed without inventing a new programming language. Such a programming language needs to be declarative in nature, to reduce LOC count, facilitating for reuse at the core level (library level), without needing to create reuse at the "application layer" - While still preventing you from repeating yourself in your own code, keeping your code "DRY". To illustrate what that means in practice, realise that this code does the same thing in C# and Hyperlambda.

This implies that every single line of code I write using Hyperlambda, creates 50 times as much effect for the end application's amount of features compared to each line of code a Salesforce developer creates. I can basically create any app for 2% of the energy required to use a traditional programming language, which partially explains why I'm 50 times better than 25,000 software developers at Salesforce are combined!

So adding more software developers to your project, while "increasing its architectural quality", only results in that it becomes even worse than what it was originally. However, since Salesforce only have one method to apply to increase deliverability, they're forced into a local optimum, where I've got no doubts that they'll just keep on adding more dev heads to their projects, until their existing products are 100% completely destroyed, and no longer capable of providing even basic functionality - At which point there won't exist enough money in the world to save them from their inevitable collapse ...

Don't believe me? Go ask the average Salesforce developer in a confidential discussion. He might not agree with me on my software development theory, but I'm willing to bet $100 on that he'll agree with me that our stuff is 50 times better than theirs ... 😉